金色时刻 · 15:48
让好资源,触手可及
AGENT SKILL

empirical-validation

empirical-validation 是面向商业与营销的 Agent Skill,来自 toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity。查看技能说明、操作步骤与使用约定,并通过原项目了解详细用法。

Requires proof before marking work complete — no "trust me, it works"

SKILL.md

下载 MD ↓
nameEmpirical Validation
descriptionRequires proof before marking work complete — no "trust me, it works"

Empirical Validation

Core Principle

"The code looks correct" is NOT validation.

Every change must be verified with empirical evidence before being marked complete.

Validation Methods by Change Type

Change Type Required Validation Tool
UI Changes Screenshot showing expected visual state browser_subagent
API Endpoints Command showing correct response run_command
Build/Config Successful build or test output run_command
Data Changes Query showing expected data state run_command
File Operations File listing or content verification run_command

Validation Protocol

Before Marking Any Task "Done"

  1. Identify Verification Criteria - What should be true after this change? - How can that be observed?

  2. Execute Verification - Run the appropriate command or action - Capture the output/evidence

  3. Document Evidence - Add to .gsd/JOURNAL.md under the task - Include actual output, not just "passed"

  4. Confirm Against Criteria - Does evidence match expected outcome? - If not, task is NOT complete

Examples

API Endpoint Verification

# Good: Actual test showing response
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/login -d '{"email":"[email protected]"}' 
# Output: {"success":true,"token":"..."}

# Bad: Just saying "endpoint works"

UI Verification

# Good: Take screenshot with browser tool
- Navigate to /dashboard
- Capture screenshot
- Confirm: Header visible? Data loaded? Layout correct?

# Bad: "The component should render correctly"

Build Verification

# Good: Show build output
npm run build
# Output: Successfully compiled...

# Bad: "Build should work now"

Forbidden Phrases

Never use these as justification for completion: - "This should work" - "The code looks correct" - "I've made similar changes before" - "Based on my understanding" - "It follows the pattern"

Integration

This skill integrates with: - /verify — Primary workflow using this skill - /execute — Must validate before marking tasks complete - Rule 4 in GEMINI.md — Empirical Validation enforcement

Failure Handling

If verification fails:

  1. Do NOT mark task complete
  2. Document the failure in .gsd/STATE.md
  3. Create fix task if cause is known
  4. Trigger Context Health Monitor if 3+ failures

来源:toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity · MIT 许可 · 许可原文 · MD 为来源页保存的历史版本