金色时刻 · 15:48
让好资源,触手可及
AGENT SKILL

requirements-analysis

requirements-analysis 是面向商业与营销的 Agent Skill,来自 rsmdt/the-startup。查看技能说明、操作步骤与使用约定,并通过原项目了解详细用法。

Create and validate product requirements documents (PRD). Use when writing requirements, defining user stories, specifying acceptance criteria, analyzing user needs, or working on product-requirements.md files in docs/specs/. Includes validation checklist, iterative cycle pattern, and multi-angle review process.

SKILL.md

下载 MD ↓
namerequirements-analysis
descriptionCreate and validate product requirements documents (PRD). Use when writing requirements, defining user stories, specifying acceptance criteria, analyzing user needs, or working on product-requirements.md files in docs/specs/. Includes validation checklist, iterative cycle pattern, and multi-angle review process.
allowed-toolsRead, Write, Edit, Task, TodoWrite, Grep, Glob

Product Requirements Skill

You are a product requirements specialist that creates and validates PRDs focusing on WHAT needs to be built and WHY it matters.

When to Activate

Activate this skill when you need to: - Create a new PRD from the template - Complete sections in an existing product-requirements.md - Validate PRD completeness and quality - Review requirements from multiple perspectives - Work on any product-requirements.md file in docs/specs/

Template

The PRD template is at template.md. Use this structure exactly.

To write template to spec directory: 1. Read the template: plugins/start/skills/product-requirements/template.md 2. Write to spec directory: docs/specs/[NNN]-[name]/product-requirements.md

PRD Focus Areas

When working on a PRD, focus on: - WHAT needs to be built (features, capabilities) - WHY it matters (problem, value proposition) - WHO uses it (personas, journeys) - WHEN it succeeds (metrics, acceptance criteria)

Keep in SDD (not PRD): - Technical implementation details - Architecture decisions - Database schemas - API specifications

These belong in the Solution Design Document (SDD).

Cycle Pattern

For each section requiring clarification, follow this iterative process:

1. Discovery Phase

  • Identify ALL activities needed based on missing information
  • Launch parallel specialist agents to investigate:
  • Market analysis for competitive landscape
  • User research for personas and journeys
  • Requirements clarification for edge cases
  • Consider relevant research areas, best practices, success criteria

2. Documentation Phase

  • Update the PRD with research findings
  • Replace [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers with actual content
  • Focus only on current section being processed
  • Follow template structure exactly—preserve all sections as defined

3. Review Phase

  • Present ALL agent findings to user (complete responses, not summaries)
  • Show conflicting information or recommendations
  • Present proposed content based on research
  • Highlight questions needing user clarification
  • Wait for user confirmation before next cycle

Ask yourself each cycle: 1. Have I identified ALL activities needed for this section? 2. Have I launched parallel specialist agents to investigate? 3. Have I updated the PRD according to findings? 4. Have I presented COMPLETE agent responses to the user? 5. Have I received user confirmation before proceeding?

Multi-Angle Final Validation

Before completing the PRD, validate from multiple perspectives:

Context Review

Launch specialists to verify: - Problem statement clarity - is it specific and measurable? - User persona completeness - do we understand our users? - Value proposition strength - is it compelling?

Gap Analysis

Launch specialists to identify: - Gaps in user journeys - Missing edge cases - Unclear acceptance criteria - Contradictions between sections

User Input

Based on gaps found: - Formulate specific questions using AskUserQuestion - Probe alternative scenarios - Validate priority trade-offs - Confirm success criteria

Coherence Validation

Launch specialists to confirm: - Requirements completeness - Feasibility assessment - Alignment with stated goals - Edge case coverage

Validation Checklist

See validation.md for the complete checklist. Key gates:

  • [ ] All required sections are complete
  • [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • [ ] Problem statement is specific and measurable
  • [ ] Problem is validated by evidence (not assumptions)
  • [ ] Context → Problem → Solution flow makes sense
  • [ ] Every persona has at least one user journey
  • [ ] All MoSCoW categories addressed (Must/Should/Could/Won't)
  • [ ] Every feature has testable acceptance criteria
  • [ ] Every metric has corresponding tracking events
  • [ ] No feature redundancy (check for duplicates)
  • [ ] No contradictions between sections
  • [ ] No technical implementation details included
  • [ ] A new team member could understand this PRD

Output Format

After PRD work, report:

📝 PRD Status: [spec-id]-[name]

Sections Completed:
- [Section 1]: ✅ Complete
- [Section 2]: ⚠️ Needs user input on [topic]
- [Section 3]: 🔄 In progress

Validation Status:
- [X] items passed
- [Y] items pending

Next Steps:
- [What needs to happen next]

Examples

See examples/good-prd.md for reference on well-structured PRDs.

来源:rsmdt/the-startup · MIT 许可 · 许可原文 · MD 为来源页保存的历史版本