| name | frontend-code-review |
|---|---|
| description | Standardized checklist and process for reviewing frontend code (.tsx, .ts, .js). |
Frontend Code Review Skill
Intent: Use whenever requested to review frontend code (React, Next.js, TypeScript).
Supports:
- Pending-change review: Reviewing git diff or staged files.
- File-targeted review: Reviewing specific existing files.
Review Process
- Scan: Read the code to identify architectural patterns, hooks usage, and component structure.
- Check: Apply the Review Checklist.
- Report: Output findings in the Required Output Format.
Review Checklist
1. Code Quality & Style
- [ ] Naming: Are variables/functions named descriptively? (e.g.,
isLoadingvsflag) - [ ] Type Safety: Is
anyavoided? are interfaces defined clearly? - [ ] Constants: Are magic numbers/strings extracted to constants?
- [ ] Destructuring: Is consistent destructuring used for props?
2. React & Next.js Best Practices
- [ ] Hooks: Are hooks used correctly (dependency arrays, rules of hooks)?
- [ ] Server/Client: Is
'use client'used only when necessary? - [ ] Memoization: Are
useMemo/useCallbackused appropriately (not prematurely)? - [ ] Keys: Do lists have stable, unique keys?
3. Performance
- [ ] Bundle Size: Are large libraries imported entirely when tree-shaking is possible?
- [ ] Images: Is
next/imageused with proper sizing? - [ ] Renders: Are there obvious unnecessary re-renders?
4. Accessibility (a11y)
- [ ] Semantic HTML: Are
divs used wherebutton,section, etc., are needed? - [ ] Attributes: Do images have
alttext? Do inputs have labels?
Required Output Format
# Code Review
Found <N> urgent issues:
## 1. <Issue Title>
**File**: `<path>` line `<line>`
```typescript
<snippet of problematic code>
Reason: Suggested Fix:
<snippet of fixed code>
Found suggestions: - : - : ```